Re: [PATCH] git-reset: Let -q hush "locally modified" messages

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...>
Cc: Carlos Rica <jasampler@...>, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@...>, <git@...>
Date: Friday, July 25, 2008 - 5:38 pm

Hi,

Junio C Hamano wrote:

Yes, as "needs update" -> "locally modified" was.

However, scripts, that rely on filenames when doing -q (whyever),
will break.

So should I stick to "git reset -q foo >/dev/null" if I want it quiet,
or is there some chance of inclusion?

Regards,
  Stephan

-- 
Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>, PGP 0x6EDDD207FCC5040F
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] git-reset: Let -q hush "locally modified" messages, Stephan Beyer, (Fri Jul 25, 5:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH] git-reset: Let -q hush "locally modified" messages, Johannes Schindelin, (Fri Jul 25, 10:34 pm)