Re: [PATCH] bisect: error out when given any good rev that is not an ancestor of the bad rev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Junio C Hamano
Date: Monday, June 30, 2008 - 6:13 pm

Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> writes:


I do not see much niceness value to such an option, though.  I think such
a switch is going the opposite way from improving usability.

You cannot bisect the history with such a draconian switch when you learn
from somebody that 'maint' is Ok but 'master' is broken, and you already
know it is a regression somewhere introduced in 'master', because you know
you did _not_ fix it (or at least you do not remember fixing it) only for
'maint'.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] bisect: error out when given any good rev that is ..., Christian Couder, (Mon Jun 30, 3:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH] bisect: error out when given any good rev that ..., Junio C Hamano, (Mon Jun 30, 6:13 pm)