> > Comments? Opinions? Ideas?Something "like" this was my veeeery first approach: "edit" with commit was the backwards-compatible "edit" and without arguments was your "pause". Example: pick ea7beef edit # or "pause" as you suggested After a little discussion this became: pick --edit ea7beef And I can't objectively say what's better Yes. That's right. See the RFC/PATCH about git-squash mail or its parent mail[1] ;-) 1. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/84391 2) ff. and http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/84420 The open question is, if we should do this by a natural number <n> or by a commit. The natural number approach seems easier, but imagine someone pauses and does some commits (not --amend)... Here the behavior of these approaches differs. ;-) Eh, why? Ok. "file" and "patch" were both choices to me. Don't know, why I decided for "file". Right. ;) Regards and thanks, Stephan -- Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>, PGP 0x6EDDD207FCC5040F -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series.. |
| Paul Jackson | Re: cpuset-remove-sched-domain-hooks-from-cpusets |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [klibc] [patch] import socket defines |
