Something "like" this was my veeeery first approach: "edit" with commit
was the backwards-compatible "edit" and without arguments was your
"pause".
Example:
pick ea7beef
edit # or "pause" as you suggested
After a little discussion this became:
pick --edit ea7beef
And I can't objectively say what's better
Yes.
That's right. See the RFC/PATCH about git-squash mail or its parent
mail[1] ;-)
1. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/84391 2) ff.
and
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/84420
The open question is, if we should do this by a natural number <n> or
by a commit.
The natural number approach seems easier, but imagine someone pauses
and does some commits (not --amend)... Here the behavior of these
approaches differs. ;-)
Eh, why?
Ok. "file" and "patch" were both choices to me. Don't know, why I
decided for "file".
Right. ;)
Regards and thanks,
Stephan
--
Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>, PGP 0x6EDDD207FCC5040F
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html