Hi,

On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jeff King wrote:

quoted text
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 07:46:22AM +0200, Johan Herland wrote:
> 
> And I was hoping the right way to do it was to simply build the 
> interactive "e" command on top of Johannes' git-apply work. But I don't 
> think that quite makes sense. His work is about fixing up the hunk 
> header as we apply the patch, but a working "e" command in the hunk 
> selection should probably not actually apply, but simply split into two 
> hunks for the loop.

Well, maybe I am silly, but I thought that the idea with add -i (e) was 
to split off the first part, ask the user if that should be applied, and 
then go on with the rest.

But like I said, Junio convinced me that it makes not much sense to split 
somewhere else than common lines, and you have that already with the "s" 
command in add -i.

In any case, I am happy with "add -e", even more so than I though I would 
be, and therefore I do not need add -i (e).  Thus, I will just shut up and 
let you guys work it out.

Ciao,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html