On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

quoted text
> It would make a wonderfully helpful tool less helpful.

I don't agree. Tool is tool. Every tool can be used in a wrong way.
A notice to documentation that some of functionality should be used very 
carefully should be enough.

quoted text
> > Also, having a possibility to easy remove a changeset (hardly - not 
> > revert) without touching all other changesets on top is a function worth 
> > to include.
> 
> The problem there is that you -- again -- lie about the committers.  They 
> _never_ saw, approved, or tested those commits.

If I changed portion of unpublished tree, as maintainer I can combine any 
patches and it might make sense to keep at least my commit dates for my 
reference.

					Thanks,
						Jaroslav

-----
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer
ALSA Project, Red Hat, Inc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html