Re: Commit annotations (was:: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <git@...>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@...>, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Date: Tuesday, June 3, 2008 - 7:59 pm

On Tuesday 03 June 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

Yes, I made the first (severely misguided) implementations [1][2] which
prompted Dscho to create an alternative implementation [3]. Although Dscho's
design was certainly more Git-esque than mine (keeping the notes in a
(pseudo)branch instead of creating a totally separate infrastructure for
note storage), at some point his efforts stalled (due to a combination of
scalability problems and/or lack of interest, IIRC).

I was happy to see some of this work recently resumed by Geoffrey Irving
[4].

(Side note: It is funny how Geoffrey's patch-id cache can be seen as yet
another instance of the reverse-mapping softref mechanism I proposed as
part of the first git-notes implementation [5])

From the initial interest in git-notes, and the sporadic requests that have
been posted since its first mention, it seems that git-notes would be a
useful feature for many Git users. However, neither me nor Dscho have the
time/interest to keep pushing it. Maybe it's time for someone else to pick
up the torch?


Have fun! :)

...Johan


[1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/46770/focus=48540
[2]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/49052
[3]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/52598
[4]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/83484
[5]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/49052/focus=49592

-- 
Johan Herland, <johan@herland.net>
www.herland.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Jakub Narebski, (Mon Jun 2, 9:14 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Jakub Narebski, (Tue Jun 3, 7:27 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Daniel Villeneuve, (Mon Jun 2, 10:16 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jun 2, 10:05 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Jakub Narebski, (Tue Jun 3, 3:32 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Jun 3, 3:54 pm)
Re: Commit annotations (was:: Octopus merge: unique (?) to g..., Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Jun 3, 4:33 pm)
Re: Commit annotations (was:: Octopus merge: unique (?) to g..., Johan Herland, (Tue Jun 3, 7:59 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jun 3, 3:53 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jun 3, 12:29 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Jakub Narebski, (Tue Jun 3, 2:39 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jun 3, 3:11 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Jun 2, 11:56 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Jun 3, 10:40 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jun 3, 8:33 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jun 3, 1:17 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jun 3, 3:30 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jun 3, 6:08 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jun 3, 9:02 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Jun 3, 1:28 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jun 3, 1:42 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Jun 3, 4:31 am)