Home » Mailing list archives » git » 2008 » June » 3

Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Junio C Hamano
Subject: Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?
Date: Monday, June 2, 2008 - 10:42 pm

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:


No.  Can you tell which flag is safe to use in this context without
digging around too much?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Jakub Narebski, (Mon Jun 2, 6:14 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Jun 2, 7:05 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Daniel Villeneuve, (Mon Jun 2, 7:16 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Jun 2, 8:56 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Jun 2, 9:29 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Jun 2, 10:17 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Jun 2, 10:28 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Jun 2, 10:42 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Jakub Narebski, (Mon Jun 2, 11:39 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jun 3, 12:11 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Jakub Narebski, (Tue Jun 3, 12:32 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jun 3, 12:53 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Jun 3, 1:31 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Matthieu Moy, (Tue Jun 3, 3:06 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, SZEDER , (Tue Jun 3, 3:40 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Jakub Narebski, (Tue Jun 3, 4:27 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Matthieu Moy, (Tue Jun 3, 4:53 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Jun 3, 7:40 am)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jun 3, 12:30 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Jun 3, 12:54 pm)
Commit annotations (was:: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git ..., Jakub Narebski, (Tue Jun 3, 1:27 pm)
Re: Commit annotations (was:: Octopus merge: unique (?) to ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Jun 3, 1:33 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, SZEDER , (Tue Jun 3, 1:39 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jun 3, 3:08 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, SZEDER , (Tue Jun 3, 4:10 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Miklos Vajna, (Tue Jun 3, 4:11 pm)
Re: Commit annotations (was:: Octopus merge: unique (?) to ..., Johan Herland, (Tue Jun 3, 4:59 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jun 3, 5:33 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Jeff King, (Tue Jun 3, 5:35 pm)
Re: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jun 3, 6:02 pm)