Patrick.Higgins@cexp.com wrote:That is correct, but you only need to do the change if the projects B, C, D, n... actually requires the new feature/bugfix introduced in Common. Otherwise you can just leave it as-is. Besides, when an important bugfix is added to Common, you probably want to cut new releases from B, C, D, n... anyway, so it still means doing stuff to those repositories. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: 2.6.25-rc2 System no longer powers off after suspend-to-disk. Screen becomes g... |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Ray Lee | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
