In case anybody cares, the obvious diff for this part is appended. The
FIXME! was wrong anyway - any collision detection needs to be done by the
callers when they do the "do we already have this object". Doing it in
write_loose_object() is too late (not to mention the wrong place to try to
do so anyway - not all callers generate new objects: some callers just
turn a packed object into a loose one).
Linus
---
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:17:10 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] write_loose_object: don't bother trying to read an old object
Before even calling this, all callers have done a "has_sha1_file(sha1)"
or "has_loose_object(sha1)" check, so there is no point in doing a
second check.
If something races with us on object creation, we handle that in the
final link() that moves it to the right place.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
sha1_file.c | 14 --------------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sha1_file.c b/sha1_file.c
index f9ec069..4255099 100644
--- a/sha1_file.c
+++ b/sha1_file.c
@@ -2160,20 +2160,6 @@ static int write_loose_object(const unsigned char *sha1, char *hdr, int hdrlen,
static char tmpfile[PATH_MAX];
filename = sha1_file_name(sha1);
- fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY);
- if (fd >= 0) {
- /*
- * FIXME!!! We might do collision checking here, but we'd
- * need to uncompress the old file and check it. Later.
- */
- close(fd);
- return 0;
- }
-
- if (errno != ENOENT) {
- return error("sha1 file %s: %s\n", filename, strerror(errno));
- }
-
fd = create_tmpfile(tmpfile, sizeof(tmpfile), filename);
if (fd < 0) {
if (errno == EPERM)
--
1.5.6.rc3.7.g336d0.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html