"git pull . <branch>" versus "git merge <branch>"

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rene Herman
Date: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 - 5:51 pm

Good day.

The manpages seem to be making somewhat of a point of mentioning "git 
pull . <branch>" as the way to merge a local branch into the current one 
but a simple "git merge <branch>" seems to work well. Is there a difference?

Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
"git pull . <branch>" versus "git merge <branch>", Rene Herman, (Tue Jun 10, 5:51 pm)