login
Header Space

 
 

Re: git mergetool vs stash apply

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@...>
Cc: <git@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 - 5:02 am

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:02:44PM +0400, Alexander Gladysh wrote:


I think there is something else going on, because it _does_ generally
work. This simple test case should confirm:

  mkdir repo && cd repo && git init
  echo content >file && git add . && git commit -m one
  echo changes >>file && git commit -a -m two
  echo more >>file && git stash
  git checkout -b other HEAD^
  echo different changes >>file && git commit -a -m three
  git stash apply
  git mergetool

I get:
  Normal merge conflict for 'file':
    {local}: modified
    {remote}: modified
  Hit return to start merge resolution tool (xxdiff):

So there is perhaps something specific about your setup or your conflict
that is causing mergetool not to work as expected. Can you give us a
test case that fails?

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
git mergetool vs stash apply, Alexander Gladysh, (Tue May 20, 4:02 am)
Re: git mergetool vs stash apply, Jeff King, (Tue May 20, 5:02 am)
Re: git mergetool vs stash apply, Alexander Gladysh, (Tue May 20, 7:16 am)
Re: git mergetool vs stash apply, Jakub Narebski, (Tue May 20, 7:52 am)
Re: git mergetool vs stash apply, Alexander Gladysh, (Tue May 20, 8:32 am)
Re: git mergetool vs stash apply, Jeff King, (Tue May 20, 8:45 am)
speck-geostationary