On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Stephen R. van den Berg <srb@cuci.nl> wrote:
quoted text
>  So, I'd say, since the current code does not and cannot work reliably
>  for anyone specifically using --first-parent (with every merge
>  encountered, the probability of correctness is multiplied by 0.5 at
>  most/least), you are going to do them a favour anyway by fixing the code,
>  then why not simplify the convolution and make the code rock-steady (and
>  implement my patch)?

The current 'next' branch in git.git contains your patch with my fixup
on top and I believe this fixes _both_ the original issue with
first-parent (thanks to your patch) and the issue Nanako discovered
(thanks to my patch). Am I missing something?

-- 
larsh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html