Re: git repository size vs. subversion repository size

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Stephen Bannasch
Date: Friday, April 4, 2008 - 5:04 pm

>On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 07:49:24PM -0400, Stephen Bannasch wrote:

I think because it is not necessary for continued productive use of git and the gc operation is expensive. On the repo above it took about 8 hours running in the background while I was working on other stuff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
git repository size vs. subversion repository size, Sean Brown, (Fri Apr 4, 3:02 pm)
Re: git repository size vs. subversion repository size, Stephen Bannasch, (Fri Apr 4, 4:49 pm)
Re: git repository size vs. subversion repository size, Steven Walter, (Fri Apr 4, 5:01 pm)
Re: git repository size vs. subversion repository size, Stephen Bannasch, (Fri Apr 4, 5:04 pm)
Re: git repository size vs. subversion repository size, Shawn O. Pearce, (Fri Apr 4, 8:11 pm)