Re: [PATCH] Add compat/vsnprintf.c for systems that returns -1 on maxsize reached

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Johannes Sixt
Date: Wednesday, March 5, 2008 - 9:04 am

Wayne Davison schrieb:

No.

If one *printf function is replaced, all of them must be replaced. The
reason is that, eg. on Windows we don't have %llu, but we have %I64u. So
depending on which flavor of *printf is called, we would have to supply
the one format (rsync_printf: %llu) or the other format (fprintf et al:
%I64u).

-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] Add compat/vsnprintf.c for systems that return ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Mar 4, 7:09 am)
Re: [PATCH] Add compat/vsnprintf.c for systems that return ..., Finn Arne Gangstad, (Tue Mar 4, 7:09 am)
Re: [PATCH] Add compat/vsnprintf.c for systems that return ..., Johannes Sixt, (Wed Mar 5, 9:04 am)