Re: [PATCH] rebase with preserve merges should not show merged commits

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Björn <B.Steinbrink@...>
Cc: <git@...>, <gitster@...>
Date: Saturday, March 22, 2008 - 10:06 am

Hallo Bj=C3=B6rn,

Bj=C3=B6rn Steinbrink schrieb am Sat 22. Mar, 02:52 (+0100):
ts
ts

Ahh, now I see what you've tried to say. I did add the option
--first-parent for rebase interactive *without* preserve merges, too.
I'll update my patch.

Bye, J=C3=B6rg.
--=20
=E2=80=9CScience is the game we play with God to find out what his rules ar=
e.=E2=80=9D
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] rebase with preserve merges should not show merg..., Johannes Schindelin, (Fri Mar 21, 9:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rebase with preserve merges should not show merg..., Johannes Schindelin, (Sat Mar 22, 7:22 am)
Re: [PATCH] rebase with preserve merges should not show merg..., Jörg, (Sat Mar 22, 10:06 am)
Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] rebase with preserve merges should not sh..., Johannes Schindelin, (Sat Mar 22, 10:46 am)
[PATCH v2 3/5] , Jörg Sommer, (Sat Mar 22, 10:08 am)
[PATCH] , Jörg Sommer, (Fri Mar 21, 9:19 pm)
[PATCH] New tests to check rebase with preserve merges, Jörg Sommer, (Fri Mar 21, 9:19 pm)