Re: [PATCH] rebase with preserve merges should not show merged commits

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jörg
Date: Saturday, March 22, 2008 - 2:40 am

Hallo Bj=F6rn,

Bj=F6rn Steinbrink schrieb am Sat 22. Mar, 02:52 (+0100):
ts
ts

Because I didn't see why it's useful to edit A and create A' and merge in
A again, later.

M---A---B
 \       \
  C---D---+---o branch

M---A--------------B
 \                  \
  C---B'---D'---A'---+---o branch

Bye, J=F6rg.
--=20
Viele Leute glauben, dass sie denken, wenn sie lediglich
ihre Vorurteile neu ordnen.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] , Jörg Sommer, (Fri Mar 21, 6:19 pm)
[PATCH] New tests to check rebase with preserve merges, Jörg Sommer, (Fri Mar 21, 6:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rebase with preserve merges should not show me ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Fri Mar 21, 6:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH] rebase with preserve merges should not show me ..., Jörg, (Sat Mar 22, 2:40 am)
Re: [PATCH] rebase with preserve merges should not show me ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Sat Mar 22, 4:22 am)
[PATCH v2 3/5] , Jörg Sommer, (Sat Mar 22, 7:08 am)
Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] rebase with preserve merges should not ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Sat Mar 22, 7:46 am)