On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted text
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > If "--prune" is passed to gc, it still just calls "git prune".
> > Otherwise, "prune --expire 2.weeks.ago" is called, where the grace
> > period is overrideable by the config variable gc.pruneExpire.
> 
> "What it does."
> 
> > While adding a test to t5304-prune.sh (since it really tests the
> > implicit call to "prune"), the original test for "prune --expire"
> > is moved there from t1410-reflog.sh, where it did not belong.
> 
> "What the fallouts from this change were."
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> 
> Can we also have "why this is a good idea", "what problem this solves"?

FWIW, my agreeing with the "why this is a good idea" can be translated 
into:

Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html