Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@...>
Cc: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@...>, <git@...>
Date: Saturday, February 9, 2008 - 11:54 am

Hi Johannes,

One more 'thank you' for the review - now publically :-)

On Friday 08 February 2008 22:52, Johannes Schindelin wrote:


Yes; still even though the 'alteranates' and 'remote alternates' have some of 
the ideas common, the implementation differs (and has to differ) - so I think 
you are right even in the --lazy option for clone instead of reusing -s.

For the rest - I'll post the updated patch ASAP.

Regards,
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept, Jakub Narebski, (Fri Feb 8, 5:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept, Johannes Schindelin, (Fri Feb 8, 5:52 pm)
Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept, Jan Holesovsky, (Sat Feb 9, 11:54 am)
Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept, Mike Hommey, (Fri Feb 8, 6:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept, Johannes Schindelin, (Fri Feb 8, 6:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept, Mike Hommey, (Fri Feb 8, 6:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept, Johannes Schindelin, (Fri Feb 8, 7:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept, Mike Hommey, (Fri Feb 8, 7:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept, Jan Hudec, (Sat Feb 9, 5:20 pm)