Hi Jakub, On Friday 08 February 2008 20:00, Jakub Narebski wrote:Unfortunately not yet :-( The only data I have that clone done on git://localhost/ooo.git took 10 minutes without the lazy clone, and 7.5 minutes with it - and then I sent the patch for review here ;-) The deadline for our SVN vs. git comparison for OOo is the next Friday, so I'll definitely have some better data by then. As I answered elsewhere, unfortunately it goes out of memory even on 8G machine (x86-64), so... But still trying. I tried to look into it a bit, but unfortunately did not see a clear way how to do it transparently for the user - say you pull a branch that is based off a commit you do not have. But of course, I could have missed something ;-) Right, might be interesting as well. But still the missing push/pull is problematic for us [or at least I see it as a problem ;-)]. Yes, and got to much nicer repositories by that ;-) - by only moving some binary stuff out of the CVS to a separate tree. The problem is that the deal is to compare the same stuff in SVN and git - so no choice for me in fact. I hope it will be doable _if_ the git wins & will be chosen for OOo. I'll try to provide the data ASAP. Regards, Jan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 027/196] tifm: Convert from class_device to device for TI flash media |
| Kok, Auke | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1 |
| Trent Piepho | Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [PATCH 01/10] x86: add Kconfig entry for DMA-API debugging |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
