On Feb 9, 2008, at 3:46 AM, Jeff King wrote:A similar proposal was discussed last October/November and we already had patches. We decided against it. The reason is that the post-condition of "git push" is that all heads that are considered by the push shall be identical locally and at the remote. If "git push" does not achieve this it should report the branches for which the post-condition is not met. I think Dscho means: do not duplicate remote branches as local branches. Keep the number of local branches as low as possible. Only if you want to work on a remote branch, create a local branch, commit you work, push, and *delete* the local branch. However, I often use local branches as a reminder which remote branches I am actively monitoring. If I start to work on them I first review what's new with "gitk origin/topic --not topic" and then do the fast forward "git push . origin/topic:topic" before I actually start working "git checkout topic". For these branches, Dschos proposal does not work for me. Steffen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Theodore Tso | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scan... |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH] [0/45] x86 2.6.24 patches review I |
git: | |
| Wenji Wu | RE: A Linux TCP SACK Question |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
