Re: read_branches_file ()

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@...>
Cc: <git@...>
Date: Friday, February 8, 2008 - 12:49 pm

On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:22:45 +0000 (GMT), Johannes Schindelin
<Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:


dropped


took another approach, as that also addresses the other fopen () call


This patch was not sent to be applied as-is, only as a proof-of-concept
Not that I agree to the layout/indentation, the new patch is sent trying
to follow what you use.


you said please :)


Done

-- 
H.Merijn Brand         Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
using & porting perl 5.6.2, 5.8.x, 5.10.x  on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11,
& 11.23, SuSE 10.1 & 10.2, AIX 5.2, and Cygwin.       http://qa.perl.org
http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/            http://www.test-smoke.org
                        http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
read_branches_file (), H.Merijn Brand, (Fri Feb 8, 11:50 am)
Re: read_branches_file (), Daniel Barkalow, (Fri Feb 8, 1:18 pm)
Re: read_branches_file (), H.Merijn Brand, (Fri Feb 8, 12:03 pm)
Re: read_branches_file (), Andreas Ericsson, (Mon Feb 11, 6:00 am)
Re: read_branches_file (), H.Merijn Brand, (Mon Feb 11, 6:17 am)
Re: read_branches_file (), Johannes Schindelin, (Fri Feb 8, 12:22 pm)
Re: read_branches_file (), H.Merijn Brand, (Fri Feb 8, 12:49 pm)