Home » Mailing list archives » git » 2008 » February » 7

Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
To: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@...>
Cc: Anand Kumria <wildfire@...>, <git@...>
Subject: Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8
Date: Thursday, February 7, 2008 - 4:54 pm

On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:

Sure. But I'd like to point out that there are tons of distributiors of 
Linux _and_ other operating systems - with real lawyers involved - that 
distribute things compiled with OpenSSL, and nobody sane actually thinks 
it is a problem. The fact that the OpenSSL license isn't compatible with 
GPL is a total non-issue: people compile GPL'd programs against totally 
proprietary libraries or other non-GPL-compatible things.


Umm. You claimed that the result would not be "distributable". I just 
both corrected that total misunderstanding (on part of the Debian crowd) 
_and_ said that even crazy Debian people can work around it.

So please don't say that things are not "distributable" when they clearly 
are. 

			Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Anand Kumria, (Thu Feb 7, 6:15 am)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Dmitry Potapov, (Thu Feb 7, 7:23 pm)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Frank Lichtenheld, (Thu Feb 7, 10:23 am)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Feb 7, 2:42 pm)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Jeff King, (Thu Feb 7, 4:40 pm)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Feb 7, 5:01 pm)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Jeff King, (Thu Feb 7, 6:40 pm)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Dmitry Potapov, (Thu Feb 7, 5:53 pm)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Jeff King, (Thu Feb 7, 6:46 pm)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Martin Langhoff, (Thu Feb 7, 5:47 pm)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Frank Lichtenheld, (Thu Feb 7, 4:14 pm)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Feb 7, 4:54 pm)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Anand Kumria, (Thu Feb 7, 5:36 pm)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Jeff King, (Thu Feb 7, 7:06 am)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Mike Hommey, (Thu Feb 7, 8:10 am)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Jeff King, (Thu Feb 7, 8:28 am)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Mike Hommey, (Thu Feb 7, 6:02 pm)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Jeff King, (Thu Feb 7, 8:32 pm)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Mike Hommey, (Fri Feb 8, 3:18 am)
Re: git-fetch in 1.5.4 fails versus 1.5.3.8, Mike Hommey, (Fri Feb 8, 3:34 am)
[PATCH] Work around curl-gnutls not liking to be reinitialized, Mike Hommey, (Fri Feb 8, 4:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Work around curl-gnutls not liking to be reiniti..., Jeff King, (Fri Feb 8, 10:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Work around curl-gnutls not liking to be reiniti..., Mike Hommey, (Fri Feb 8, 5:31 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Work around curl-gnutls not liking to be reiniti..., Johannes Schindelin, (Fri Feb 8, 5:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Work around curl-gnutls not liking to be reiniti..., Mike Hommey, (Fri Feb 8, 6:01 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Work around curl-gnutls not liking to be reiniti..., Junio C Hamano, (Fri Feb 8, 5:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Work around curl-gnutls not liking to be reiniti..., Mike Hommey, (Fri Feb 8, 5:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Work around curl-gnutls not liking to be reiniti..., Mike Hommey, (Fri Feb 8, 6:09 pm)
[PATCH v2] Work around curl-gnutls not liking to be reinitia..., Mike Hommey, (Fri Feb 8, 6:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH v2] Work around curl-gnutls not liking to be rein..., Florian Weimer, (Sat Feb 9, 5:44 am)
Re: [PATCH v2] Work around curl-gnutls not liking to be rein..., Mike Hommey, (Sat Feb 9, 6:43 am)
Re: [PATCH v2] Work around curl-gnutls not liking to be rein..., Johannes Schindelin, (Fri Feb 8, 6:51 pm)
[PATCH] Work around curl-gnutls not liking to be reinitialized, Mike Hommey, (Fri Feb 8, 7:08 pm)
[PATCH v4] Work around curl-gnutls not liking to be reinitia..., Mike Hommey, (Sat Feb 9, 5:41 am)
Re: [PATCH] Work around curl-gnutls not liking to be reiniti..., Mike Hommey, (Fri Feb 8, 7:14 pm)