* Thu 2008-02-07 Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> * Message-Id: alpine.LSU.1.00.0802071255110.8543@racer.siteI don't quite understand. - When you install a GPL program in Linux (trough package manager). It gets installed. - When git is installed Under Windows / Cygwin, it gets installed. ... and if the git is installed trough windows installer, you need to *accept* the install? I really don't follow why there is need to force Windows type EULA questions through the end users' throat in that particular case, when it is not done in other cases. Jari -- Welcome to FOSS revolution: we fix and modify until it shines - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
