Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@...>, <git@...>
Date: Monday, February 4, 2008 - 4:50 pm

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:

.. and it won't actually solve the problem you pointed to. It's not enough 
that the positive commits should be connected to the negative ones, the 
problem is that no negative ones could possibly connect to the positives. 

So scratch that patch as broken too. 

Really annoying. It does look like we really want to check the *totally* 
connected case, and we simply cannot do the "two unconnected trees" 
decision case without traversing both trees fully (since we won't know 
that they are *really* unconnected until we do).

And that seems really quite expensive. I wonder if I've missed something 
again.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[BUG?] git log picks up bad commit, Tilman Sauerbeck, (Sat Feb 2, 8:21 am)
Re: [BUG?] git log picks up bad commit, Jeff King, (Sat Feb 2, 11:00 pm)
[RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Jeff King, (Sun Feb 3, 12:33 am)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Feb 4, 1:32 pm)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Feb 4, 3:08 pm)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Feb 4, 4:03 pm)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Feb 4, 4:50 pm)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Feb 5, 3:14 am)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Feb 5, 5:23 pm)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Feb 5, 6:34 pm)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Feb 5, 9:51 pm)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Junio C Hamano, (Wed Feb 6, 2:05 am)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Junio C Hamano, (Wed Feb 6, 2:17 am)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Nicolas Pitre, (Tue Feb 5, 9:22 pm)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Feb 5, 7:59 pm)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Tilman Sauerbeck, (Wed Feb 6, 12:43 pm)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Feb 6, 3:26 pm)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Nicolas Pitre, (Wed Feb 6, 1:28 pm)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Feb 6, 1:42 pm)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Nicolas Pitre, (Wed Feb 6, 1:48 pm)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Feb 4, 4:06 pm)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Feb 4, 1:37 pm)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Junio C Hamano, (Sun Feb 3, 2:39 am)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Jeff King, (Sun Feb 3, 3:13 am)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Jeff King, (Sun Feb 3, 3:18 am)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Junio C Hamano, (Sun Feb 3, 4:18 am)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Junio C Hamano, (Sun Feb 3, 3:40 am)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Junio C Hamano, (Sun Feb 3, 3:47 am)
Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored, Junio C Hamano, (Sun Feb 3, 2:24 am)