Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at> writes:As I believe in belt-and-suspenders when it comes to validation, I am somewhat uneasy with this change. If it ever turns out that we would need to make parse_commit_buffer() more lenient during the normal operation, some of this would need to be reverted (for example, you may not need to have a valid "tree" to salvage the log messages from a corrupt history by running "git log"), and forgetting to do so will result in fsck that does not validate enough. The validation done by parse_commit_buffer() and fsck serve two different purposes, and they can have different leniency requirements. I do not necessarily agree that it is a good idea to tie them together like this patch. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.25-rc4 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 |
git: | |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Radu Rendec | htb parallelism on multi-core platforms |
