[PATCH] checkout: tone down the "forked status" diagnostic messages

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <git@...>
Cc: Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@...>, Jeff King <peff@...>, Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@...>, Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@...>, Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@...>
Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 - 7:05 pm

When checking out a branch that is behind or forked from a
branch you are building on top of, we used to show full
left-right log but if you already _know_ you have long history
since you forked, it is a bit too much.

This tones down the message quite a bit, by only showing the
number of commits each side has since they diverged.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---

 * This obviously comes on top of the earlier patch of mine,
   which in turn is on top of Daniel's "checkout written in C".

 builtin-checkout.c |  102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin-checkout.c b/builtin-checkout.c
index 5291f72..261f67f 100644
--- a/builtin-checkout.c
+++ b/builtin-checkout.c
@@ -301,64 +301,88 @@ static void adjust_to_tracking(struct branch_info *new, struct checkout_opts *op
 	char *base;
 	unsigned char sha1[20];
 	struct commit *ours, *theirs;
-	const char *msgfmt;
 	char symmetric[84];
-	int show_log;
+	struct rev_info revs;
+	const char *rev_argv[10];
+	int rev_argc;
+	int num_ours, num_theirs;
+	const char *remote_msg;
 	struct branch *branch = branch_get(NULL);
 
+	/*
+	 * Nothing to report unless we are marked to build on top of
+	 * somebody else.
+	 */
 	if (!branch || !branch->merge)
 		return;
 
-	base = branch->merge[0]->dst;
-
-	ours = new->commit;
-
-	sprintf(symmetric, "%s", sha1_to_hex(ours->object.sha1));
-
 	/*
-	 * Ok, it is tracking base; is it ahead of us?
+	 * If what we used to build on no longer exists, there is
+	 * nothing to report.
 	 */
+	base = branch->merge[0]->dst;
 	if (!resolve_ref(base, sha1, 1, NULL))
 		return;
-	theirs = lookup_commit(sha1);
-
-	sprintf(symmetric + 40, "...%s", sha1_to_hex(sha1));
 
+	theirs = lookup_commit(sha1);
+	ours = new->commit;
 	if (!hashcmp(sha1, ours->object.sha1))
 		return; /* we are the same */
 
-	show_log = 1;
-	if (in_merge_bases(theirs, &ours, 1)) {
-		msgfmt = "You are ahead of the tracked branch '%s'\n";
-		show_log = 0;
+	/* Run "rev-list --left-right ours...theirs" internally... */
+	rev_argc = 0;
+	rev_argv[rev_argc++] = NULL;
+	rev_argv[rev_argc++] = "--left-right";
+	rev_argv[rev_argc++] = symmetric;
+	rev_argv[rev_argc++] = "--";
+	rev_argv[rev_argc] = NULL;
+
+	strcpy(symmetric, sha1_to_hex(ours->object.sha1));
+	strcpy(symmetric + 40, "...");
+	strcpy(symmetric + 43, sha1_to_hex(theirs->object.sha1));
+
+	init_revisions(&revs, NULL);
+	setup_revisions(rev_argc, rev_argv, &revs, NULL);
+	prepare_revision_walk(&revs);
+
+	/* ... and count the commits on each side. */
+	num_ours = 0;
+	num_theirs = 0;
+	while (1) {
+		struct commit *c = get_revision(&revs);
+		if (!c)
+			break;
+		if (c->object.flags & SYMMETRIC_LEFT)
+			num_ours++;
+		else
+			num_theirs++;
 	}
-	else if (in_merge_bases(ours, &theirs, 1))
-		msgfmt = "Your branch can be fast-forwarded to the tracked branch '%s'\n";
-	else
-		msgfmt = "Both your branch and the tracked branch '%s' have own changes, you would eventually need to merge\n";
 
-	if (!prefixcmp(base, "refs/remotes/"))
+	if (!prefixcmp(base, "refs/remotes/")) {
+		remote_msg = " remote";
 		base += strlen("refs/remotes/");
-	fprintf(stderr, msgfmt, base);
-
-	if (show_log) {
-		const char *args[32];
-		int ac;
-
-		ac = 0;
-		args[ac++] = "log";
-		args[ac++] = "--pretty=oneline";
-		args[ac++] = "--abbrev-commit";
-		args[ac++] = "--left-right";
-		args[ac++] = "--boundary";
-		args[ac++] = symmetric;
-		args[ac++] = "--";
-		args[ac] = NULL;
-
-		run_command_v_opt(args, RUN_GIT_CMD);
+	} else {
+		remote_msg = "";
 	}
-}
 
+	if (!num_theirs)
+		printf("Your branch is ahead of the tracked%s branch '%s' "
+		       "by %d commit%s.\n",
+		       remote_msg, base,
+		       num_ours, (num_ours == 1) ? "" : "s");
+	else if (!num_ours)
+		printf("Your branch is behind of the tracked%s branch '%s' "
+		       "by %d commit%s,\n"
+		       "and can be fast-forwarded.\n",
+		       remote_msg, base,
+		       num_theirs, (num_theirs == 1) ? "" : "s");
+	else
+		printf("Your branch and the tracked%s branch '%s' "
+		       "have diverged,\nand respectively "
+		       "have %d and %d different commit(s) each.\n",
+		       remote_msg, base,
+		       num_ours, num_theirs);
+}
 
 static void update_refs_for_switch(struct checkout_opts *opts,
 				   struct branch_info *old,
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Minor annoyance with git push, Martin Langhoff, (Fri Feb 8, 12:44 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Jeff King, (Fri Feb 8, 11:00 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Steffen Prohaska, (Sat Feb 9, 6:53 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Johannes Schindelin, (Sat Feb 9, 9:10 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Junio C Hamano, (Sat Feb 9, 10:07 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Johannes Schindelin, (Sat Feb 9, 10:15 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Wincent Colaiuta, (Sun Feb 10, 10:03 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Feb 10, 12:26 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Wincent Colaiuta, (Sun Feb 10, 2:18 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Jeff King, (Sun Feb 10, 6:34 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Junio C Hamano, (Sun Feb 10, 6:59 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Jeff King, (Sun Feb 10, 7:29 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Steven Walter, (Sun Feb 10, 11:02 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Feb 10, 12:29 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Jeff King, (Sun Feb 10, 6:17 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Feb 10, 8:20 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Jeff King, (Sun Feb 10, 8:23 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Feb 10, 9:04 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Junio C Hamano, (Wed Feb 20, 4:23 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Jeff King, (Wed Feb 20, 10:03 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Johannes Schindelin, (Wed Feb 20, 9:06 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Jay Soffian, (Wed Feb 20, 11:20 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Johannes Schindelin, (Wed Feb 20, 11:38 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Steven Walter, (Thu Feb 21, 6:35 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Johannes Schindelin, (Thu Feb 21, 8:11 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Jeff King, (Sun Feb 10, 9:07 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Junio C Hamano, (Fri Feb 8, 11:24 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Martin Langhoff, (Sat Feb 9, 7:50 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Junio C Hamano, (Sat Feb 9, 10:24 pm)
[PATCH] checkout: tone down the "forked status" diagnostic m..., Junio C Hamano, (Wed Feb 20, 7:05 pm)
[PATCH] checkout: updates to tracking report, Junio C Hamano, (Wed Feb 20, 11:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH] checkout: updates to tracking report, Daniel Barkalow, (Thu Feb 21, 1:02 pm)
Re: [PATCH] checkout: updates to tracking report, Jay Soffian, (Thu Feb 21, 1:27 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Jeff King, (Sun Feb 10, 6:13 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Feb 10, 8:22 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Johannes Schindelin, (Sat Feb 9, 9:06 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Jeff King, (Fri Feb 8, 11:55 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Sean, (Fri Feb 8, 1:38 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Steffen Prohaska, (Fri Feb 8, 2:29 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Johannes Schindelin, (Fri Feb 8, 7:50 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Martin Langhoff, (Fri Feb 8, 6:27 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Jeff King, (Fri Feb 8, 10:46 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Steffen Prohaska, (Sat Feb 9, 7:22 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Jeff King, (Fri Feb 8, 10:54 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Johannes Schindelin, (Sat Feb 9, 9:04 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Jeff King, (Sat Feb 9, 9:22 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Johannes Schindelin, (Fri Feb 8, 6:57 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Martin Langhoff, (Fri Feb 8, 12:50 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Johannes Schindelin, (Fri Feb 8, 7:52 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Martin Langhoff, (Fri Feb 8, 6:23 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Mike Hommey, (Fri Feb 8, 6:27 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Junio C Hamano, (Fri Feb 8, 3:48 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Steffen Prohaska, (Sat Feb 9, 7:22 am)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Junio C Hamano, (Sat Feb 9, 11:44 pm)
Re: Minor annoyance with git push, Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Feb 10, 8:21 am)