* Sat 2008-02-02 Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> gmane.comp.version-control.git * Message-Id: 20080202084406.GA15305@glandium.orgI use HEAD~1 always, because I think the consistency in learning the most important factor. It does not matter what advanced users use. The documentation should primarily focus the newcomers. The first question a newbie asks, if manual pages mixes syntaxes: What the heck "^" ?. I just saw HEAD~N, is the other one somehow special? All the other examples refer to HEAD~N Those used to git may prefer ^, but it does not follow that others necessarily do so and that that should be the "proper learning path". People usually migrate to git from other VCSs, which have very consistent UI - There are no alternatives -r1:10 Subversion -r1..19 Bzr ...etc It's unfortunate is the focus is given to comments like "easier type", when the context is the manual pages. You consider all such users insane? It actually helps to select onlyt one sytax, and HEAD~N is much more readable without further explanations, (becasue people are already used to knowing, from other VCSs, what a HEAD or TIP is). It's not all that different from prefering the "--quiet" over "-q" e.g. e.g. in shell scripts. Jari -- Welcome to FOSS revolution: we fix and modify until it shines - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.25-mm1 |
| Vladislav Bolkhovitin | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
