On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Rhodes, Kate wrote:

quoted text
> 
> On Jan 31, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> 
> > git commit supports --author to overwrite the author information on a
> > particular commit; it would be nice if git tag would offer the same.
> 
> What are the implications of this on the GPG signature aspect of git-tag
> (desired or otherwise)?
> 
> If you were committing someone else's tag wouldn't you want to sign not only
> the commit, but their signature on the commit?
> 
> Ignoring the GPG issue, I'm just not seeing the benefit to having an author
> AND a committer on a tag. I mean... it's a *tag*. The only value I see in
> having any name associated with a tag is knowing who to point the finger at
> when the wrong thing gets tagged. But, I don't see any authorship aspect to
> the concept of a tag. To me it's more: "Bob" set it and it points to this. The
> end.
> 
> What you're proposing sounds more like: "Bob" said to set it and then "Mary"
> did, because Bob said to.

And in that case this information can be contained in the tag text body 
itself.


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html