Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Sam Granieri Jr <sjgdev@...>
Cc: Björn <B.Steinbrink@...>, Git Users List <git@...>
Date: Monday, February 11, 2008 - 6:11 pm

Hi Sam,

On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:55:37AM -0600, Sam Granieri Jr wrote:

Why would you want to do that? A tag is supposed to be something
immutable. The only reason for having such a "tag branch" in the first
place is that this seems to be the best representation of what SVN is
doing and there's no better way (yet?) to convert it to something more
Git-like...

Cheers,
Sebastian

--=20
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.         -- Benjamin Franklin
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Sam Granieri Jr, (Sat Feb 9, 10:44 pm)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Sebastian Harl, (Mon Feb 11, 4:47 am)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Jan Hudec, (Fri Feb 15, 6:38 pm)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Sam Granieri Jr, (Mon Feb 11, 12:55 pm)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Sebastian Harl, (Mon Feb 11, 6:11 pm)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Michael Haggerty, (Sun Feb 10, 12:52 pm)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Michael Haggerty, (Sun Feb 10, 3:36 pm)