Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Björn <B.Steinbrink@...>
Cc: Sam Granieri Jr <sjgdev@...>, Git Users List <git@...>
Date: Monday, February 11, 2008 - 4:47 am

Hi,

On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 04:56:11AM +0100, Bj=F6rn Steinbrink wrote:
=20
=20

Well, a SVN tag could be represented as a Git branch _and_ a Git tag
pointing to the head of that branch. Whenever any such "tag branch"
advances, the user should be notified, the user responsible for the
further commits to the SVN "tag" should be seriously hurt and the Git
tag should be overwritten (git tag -f).

Sam, is that basically what you want?

Cheers,
Sebastian

--=20
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.         -- Benjamin Franklin
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Sam Granieri Jr, (Sat Feb 9, 10:44 pm)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Sebastian Harl, (Mon Feb 11, 4:47 am)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Jan Hudec, (Fri Feb 15, 6:38 pm)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Sam Granieri Jr, (Mon Feb 11, 12:55 pm)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Sebastian Harl, (Mon Feb 11, 6:11 pm)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Michael Haggerty, (Sun Feb 10, 12:52 pm)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Michael Haggerty, (Sun Feb 10, 3:36 pm)