Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@...>
Cc: Sam Granieri Jr <sjgdev@...>, Git Users List <git@...>
Date: Sunday, February 10, 2008 - 12:52 pm

Björn Steinbrink wrote:

Because of the way an SVN repository is stored, it should be cheap to
ask SVN whether the contents of a tag in the HEAD revision are identical
to the contents at the time the tag was created.  If there was any
change anywhere under the tag directory, then the node of the tag
directory will be different in the two revisions.

For that matter, you could ask SVN for information about the revisions
in which the tags/ directory was changed (this is also very cheap), and
make sure that none of those changes modified an existing tag.  This
scan could be done at the beginning of a conversion to determine which
tags were handled as pure tags (and therefore convertible as git tags)
and which were not (and therefore require more complicated handling).

Michael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Sam Granieri Jr, (Sat Feb 9, 10:44 pm)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Sebastian Harl, (Mon Feb 11, 4:47 am)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Jan Hudec, (Fri Feb 15, 6:38 pm)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Sam Granieri Jr, (Mon Feb 11, 12:55 pm)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Sebastian Harl, (Mon Feb 11, 6:11 pm)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Michael Haggerty, (Sun Feb 10, 12:52 pm)
Re: [Feature Request] Better Subversion integration, Michael Haggerty, (Sun Feb 10, 3:36 pm)