Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] deny push to current branch of non-bare repo

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...>
Cc: <git@...>, Sam Vilain <sam@...>
Date: Saturday, November 8, 2008 - 10:27 am

On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 03:16:53PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:


Yeah, I was kind of hoping we could assume that anybody relying on this
behavior was somewhat insane, and wouldn't be too upset when it broke.
But you're probably right that we should be more conservative. I'll
rework it with a "yes/no/warn" option for the config, and we can set it
to "warn" (and those who really do want it can shut off the warning with
"no"). Or we can even start with just leaving it on "no", but I think
the deprecation period should begin when we switch it to "warn".


Yes, they do break with 4/4 applied without 3/4 (that was how I found
them, but "git rebase -i" let me pretend I had the proper foresight. ;)
). We can keep 3/4 back until the switch from "warn" to "yes", if that's
what you are suggesting.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] deny push to current branch of non-bare ..., Jeff King, (Sat Nov 8, 10:27 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] deny push to current branch of non-bare ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Sat Nov 8, 11:12 am)
[PATCH 2/4] t5516: refactor oddball tests, Jeff King, (Fri Nov 7, 6:20 pm)