RE: why not TortoiseGit

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Nigel Magnay <nigel.magnay@...>
Cc: Scott Chacon <schacon@...>, Andreas Ericsson <ae@...>, Ian Hilt <ian.hilt@...>, <git@...>
Date: Tuesday, November 4, 2008 - 2:36 am

I also think it is best choose base on Tortoise SVN.  TortoriseGIt
should be in windows platform only because it is extension of explore.

Best regards
Frank Li 

-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Magnay [mailto:nigel.magnay@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 6:00 PM
To: Li Frank-B20596
Cc: Scott Chacon; Andreas Ericsson; Ian Hilt; git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why not TortoiseGit

Qgit.


TortoiseSVN is a good place to start because it separates out the
windows icon decorators into a separate DLL (shared with TortoiseCVS).
This is significant, as these are a finite resource in the windows
shell, and so having a TortoiseSVN + TortoiseGIT on one machine and you
might run out, and I'd imagine lots of people wanting both.

On the minus side, building (Tortoise)SVN requires a lot of environment
setup just to get it to build - most of which can be immediately thrown
away as it's specific to SVN.

But it doesn't look like a hard project to me, just requires stripping
out a lot of junk and re-patching callouts to a git executable (which
could be the standard git tools) and a minimal git library that knows if
files are dirty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
why not TortoiseGit, Li Frank-B20596, (Thu Oct 30, 9:44 pm)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Ian Hilt, (Fri Oct 31, 8:19 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Andreas Ericsson, (Fri Oct 31, 8:35 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Scott Chacon, (Fri Oct 31, 11:57 am)
RE: why not TortoiseGit, Li Frank, (Sun Nov 2, 10:14 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Nigel Magnay, (Mon Nov 3, 6:00 am)
RE: why not TortoiseGit, Li Frank, (Mon Nov 10, 9:51 pm)
RE: why not TortoiseGit, Li Frank, (Tue Nov 4, 2:36 am)
RE: why not TortoiseGit, Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Nov 4, 8:52 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Nov 3, 9:26 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Nigel Magnay, (Mon Nov 3, 9:39 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Jakub Narebski, (Thu Oct 30, 9:59 pm)
RE: why not TortoiseGit, Li Frank-B20596, (Thu Oct 30, 10:02 pm)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, George Shammas, (Thu Oct 30, 11:07 pm)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Miles Bader, (Thu Oct 30, 11:53 pm)