RE: why not TortoiseGit

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Scott Chacon <schacon@...>, Andreas Ericsson <ae@...>
Cc: Ian Hilt <ian.hilt@...>, <git@...>
Date: Sunday, November 2, 2008 - 10:14 am

I read some code of TortoiseSVN and TortoiseHg Code. 
At beginning, TortoiseGit can git command to get information like Qgit.
After linkable library ready, replace "git command". 

I think TortoiseGit can start base on below way.
 
1.  Base on TortoiseHg, It is python Script.  Replace below hg operator
with Git. 
2.  Base on TortoiseSVN, It is developed with C++. Need VS2008.
ToritoiseSVN provide some built in diff and merge tools. 
3.  Base on Qgit, which provide some basic UI, such comment dialogbox,
history view and file annotate. 


Best regards
Frank Li

-----Original Message-----
From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:git-owner@vger.kernel.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Chacon
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 11:58 PM
To: Andreas Ericsson
Cc: Ian Hilt; Li Frank-B20596; git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why not TortoiseGit

I'm trying to get this restarted - dscho and I talked about this at the
GitTogether, and I met some people (from the OpenAFS project that also
happened to be there, oddly) who were interested in working on this with
me.  I think the lack of a linkable library has greatly hindered the
development of projects like this, so that will likely be part of the
development process as well.

Scott

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> wrote:

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the
body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
why not TortoiseGit, Li Frank-B20596, (Thu Oct 30, 9:44 pm)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Ian Hilt, (Fri Oct 31, 8:19 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Andreas Ericsson, (Fri Oct 31, 8:35 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Scott Chacon, (Fri Oct 31, 11:57 am)
RE: why not TortoiseGit, Li Frank, (Sun Nov 2, 10:14 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Nigel Magnay, (Mon Nov 3, 6:00 am)
RE: why not TortoiseGit, Li Frank, (Mon Nov 10, 9:51 pm)
RE: why not TortoiseGit, Li Frank, (Tue Nov 4, 2:36 am)
RE: why not TortoiseGit, Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Nov 4, 8:52 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Nov 3, 9:26 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Nigel Magnay, (Mon Nov 3, 9:39 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Jakub Narebski, (Thu Oct 30, 9:59 pm)
RE: why not TortoiseGit, Li Frank-B20596, (Thu Oct 30, 10:02 pm)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, George Shammas, (Thu Oct 30, 11:07 pm)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Miles Bader, (Thu Oct 30, 11:53 pm)