On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 09:59:56PM +0100, Andreas Ericsson wrote:I don't think, that your way for relicensing is bullet proof: I consider many of my GIT patches as derived work from other parts of GIT, even if git blame is stating me as author. I can gurantee you, that I comply with the "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" point b, as its based on code out of git.git. But I can't tell you, from which files I reused code anymore. Probably other people did the same. Your method is ignoring such derived code. mfg Martin Kögler -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 014/196] kobject: remove incorrect comment in kobject_rename |
| Vladislav Bolkhovitin | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Stephen Rothwell | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Radu Rendec | htb parallelism on multi-core platforms |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
