Just wondering, has there been any looking into whether the git-notes
concept can track rebases?
Reading over what git-notes is leads me to think it could be a good
mechanism for the distributed bug-tracking idea I had some time ago.
The only gotcha I see is that there would have to be some reverse
mapping / fast lookup to track the commit objects that given notes are
attached to.... and to facilitate individual assignment... notes
applied to notes.
Example structure:
Commits A B C D
Notes BUG
Notes nA nC == bug notes
A <- nA
|\
B C <- nC
|/
D
nA <- BUG
nB <- BUG
Operations for bug-tracking:
1) List all 'BUG'-type items that would refer to individual notes
2) List 'BUG' items reachable from a point
Perhaps with criterion that a certain 'bug note' attribute is not
set...
or that a 'BUG_CLOSED' note is not attached to the given 'bug note'
... this seems to be somewhat of an extreme abuse of the notes
system... but I could imagine it may have uses outside...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.21-rc4 |
| Jens Axboe | [PATCH 0/8] IO queuing and complete affinity |
| Nicholas A. Bellinger | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Robin Lee Powell | NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested. |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [crash] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000... |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 19/37] dccp: Header option insertion routine for feature-negotiation |
| Gary Thomas | Marvell 88E609x switch? |
| Jamie Lokier | Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 |
| Jan Kara | [PATCH 10/16] ext4: Remove syncing logic from ext4_file_write |
| Jack Stone | Re: Versioning file system |
| Jens Axboe | [PATCH 8/8] vm: Add an tuning knob for vm.max_writeback_pages |
