Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> 
> > My take on the consensus for the license part of the discussion is
> > that libgit2 should be under the "GPL gcc library" license.
> > 
> > BTW, I can't actually find a copy of that license; the only thing
> > I can locate in the GCC SVN tree is a copy of the LGPL.
> 
> The exception is usually found at the top of files constituting 
> libgcc.a.  One example is gcc/config/arm/ieee754-df.S.  ;-)

Headers updated.  Its now GPL+gcc library exception.

Not that the 5 lines of useful code there really needs copyright,
but hey, whatever.

-- 
Shawn.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html