Re: why not TortoiseGit

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: George Shammas <georgyo@...>
Cc: Li Frank-B20596 <Frank.Li@...>, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@...>, <git@...>
Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008 - 11:53 pm

"George Shammas" <georgyo@gmail.com> writes:

... and from what I've seen of tortoise* users, "stupid proof" is very,
very, very, necessary...

-Miles

-- 
Immortality, n.  A toy which people cry for, And on their knees apply for,
      Dispute, contend and lie for, And if allowed Would be right proud
      Eternally to die for.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
why not TortoiseGit, Li Frank-B20596, (Thu Oct 30, 9:44 pm)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Ian Hilt, (Fri Oct 31, 8:19 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Andreas Ericsson, (Fri Oct 31, 8:35 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Scott Chacon, (Fri Oct 31, 11:57 am)
RE: why not TortoiseGit, Li Frank, (Sun Nov 2, 10:14 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Nigel Magnay, (Mon Nov 3, 6:00 am)
RE: why not TortoiseGit, Li Frank, (Mon Nov 10, 9:51 pm)
RE: why not TortoiseGit, Li Frank, (Tue Nov 4, 2:36 am)
RE: why not TortoiseGit, Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Nov 4, 8:52 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Nov 3, 9:26 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Nigel Magnay, (Mon Nov 3, 9:39 am)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Jakub Narebski, (Thu Oct 30, 9:59 pm)
RE: why not TortoiseGit, Li Frank-B20596, (Thu Oct 30, 10:02 pm)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, George Shammas, (Thu Oct 30, 11:07 pm)
Re: why not TortoiseGit, Miles Bader, (Thu Oct 30, 11:53 pm)