Re: Multiple working trees with GIT ?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Johannes Schindelin
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2008 - 6:38 am

Hi,

On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Willy Tarreau wrote:


Because multiple working trees for the same repository will always be a 
second-class citizen.  And I would rather not affect the common case too 
much.

Having a "lock" file which is heeded by just a few places which are 
supposed to update refs (thinking about it, just update_ref() should be 
enough), is at least a well-contained change.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Multiple working trees with GIT ?, Willy Tarreau, (Thu Jan 24, 12:49 am)
Re: Multiple working trees with GIT ?, Julian Phillips, (Thu Jan 24, 2:59 am)
Re: Multiple working trees with GIT ?, Johannes Schindelin, (Thu Jan 24, 4:04 am)
Re: Multiple working trees with GIT ?, Willy Tarreau, (Thu Jan 24, 5:56 am)
Re: Multiple working trees with GIT ?, Willy Tarreau, (Thu Jan 24, 5:59 am)
Re: Multiple working trees with GIT ?, Johannes Schindelin, (Thu Jan 24, 6:38 am)
Re: Multiple working trees with GIT ?, Willy Tarreau, (Thu Jan 24, 7:10 am)
Re: Multiple working trees with GIT ?, J. Bruce Fields, (Thu Jan 24, 7:51 am)