Home » Mailing list archives » git » 2008 » January » 23

git filter-branch should run git gc --auto

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Kevin Ballard <kevin@...>
To: Git Mailing List <git@...>
Subject: git filter-branch should run git gc --auto
Date: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 - 10:43 pm

I just glanced at git-filter-branch.sh (and I must say I was  
incredibly surprised to find out it was a shell script) and it seems  
it never runs git-gc or git-repack. Doesn't that end up with the same  
problems as git-svn sans git-repack when filtering a large number of  
commits? I was just thinking, if I were to git-filter-branch on my  
massive repo (in fact, the same repo that started this thread, with  
over 33000 commits in the upstream svn repo), even if I just do  
something as simple as change the commit msg wont I end up with  
thousands of unreachable objects? I shudder to think how many  
unreachable objects I would have if I pruned the entire dports  
directory off of the tree.

Am I missing something, or does git-filter-branch really not do any  
garbage collection? I tried reading the source, but complex bash  
scripts are almost as bad as perl in terms of readability.

-Kevin Ballard

-- 
Kevin Ballard
http://kevin.sb.org
kevin@sb.org
http://www.tildesoft.com
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
git-svn should default to --repack, Kevin Ballard, (Fri Jan 18, 8:17 am)
Re: git-svn should default to --repack, Karl , (Fri Jan 18, 11:56 am)
Re: git-svn should default to --repack, Junio C Hamano, (Fri Jan 18, 4:44 pm)
Re: git-svn should default to --repack, Karl , (Sat Jan 19, 8:35 am)
Re: git-svn should default to --repack, Kevin Ballard, (Sat Jan 19, 11:05 am)
[PATCH] Let "git svn" run "git gc --auto" occasionally, Karl , (Sat Jan 19, 6:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Let "git svn" run "git gc --auto" occasionally, Harvey Harrison, (Sat Jan 19, 6:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Let "git svn" run "git gc --auto" occasionally, Eric Wong, (Sat Jan 19, 11:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Let "git svn" run "git gc --auto" occasionally, Karl , (Sun Jan 20, 5:34 am)
Re: [PATCH] Let "git svn" run "git gc --auto" occasionally, Junio C Hamano, (Sun Jan 20, 3:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Let "git svn" run "git gc --auto" occasionally, Eric Wong, (Mon Jan 21, 6:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Let "git svn" run "git gc --auto" occasionally, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Jan 21, 8:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Let "git svn" run "git gc --auto" occasionally, Eric Wong, (Mon Jan 21, 8:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Let "git svn" run "git gc --auto" occasionally, Junio C Hamano, (Mon Jan 21, 9:52 pm)
git filter-branch should run git gc --auto, Kevin Ballard, (Tue Jan 22, 10:43 pm)
Re: git filter-branch should run git gc --auto, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jan 22, 10:46 pm)
Re: git filter-branch should run git gc --auto, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Jan 22, 10:52 pm)
Re: git filter-branch should run git gc --auto, Kevin Ballard, (Tue Jan 22, 11:03 pm)
Re: git filter-branch should run git gc --auto, Kevin Ballard, (Tue Jan 22, 10:58 pm)
Re: git filter-branch should run git gc --auto, Sam Vilain, (Wed Jan 23, 1:07 am)
Re: git filter-branch should run git gc --auto, Kevin Ballard, (Wed Jan 23, 4:18 am)
Re: git filter-branch should run git gc --auto, Mike Hommey, (Wed Jan 23, 2:44 am)
Re: git filter-branch should run git gc --auto, Johannes Schindelin, (Wed Jan 23, 9:00 am)
Re: git filter-branch should run git gc --auto, Junio C Hamano, (Wed Jan 23, 3:22 pm)
Re: git filter-branch should run git gc --auto, Harvey Harrison, (Tue Jan 22, 10:54 pm)
[PATCH 0/2] "git svn" and "git gc --auto", Karl , (Sun Feb 3, 12:55 pm)
[PATCH 2/2] Let "git svn" run "git gc --auto" occasionally, Karl , (Sun Feb 3, 12:56 pm)
[PATCH 1/2] git-svn: Don't call git-repack anymore, Karl , (Sun Feb 3, 12:56 pm)
[PATCH 2/2] Let "git svn" run "git gc --auto" occasionally, Karl , (Sun Jan 20, 5:40 pm)
[PATCH 1/2] git-svn: Don't call git-repack anymore, Karl , (Sun Jan 20, 5:39 pm)