Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Design for pathname encoding gitattribute [RESEND]

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@...>
Date: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 - 6:44 am

Junio C Hamano wrote:

I'm referring to the normalized form in the object database - ie what
affects the generated SHA1s - what you check it out to locally is a
developer's choice, and assuming that they can handle whatever issues
they create by doing this, then that should be fine.


Agreed - not something you want to condone, but if it's just as easy to
come up with a design that doesn't limit to one encoding for a whole
repository, it might help some people.

The use case for mixed encodings I had in mind was when you clone some
repository that's got them mixed, and you need to tell git the encoding
per-path to get the darned thing to behave sensibly for you (presumably
while you write a patch to submit upstream to fix it).

Sam.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Design for pathname encoding gitattribute ..., Sam Vilain, (Tue Jan 22, 6:44 am)
Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Design for pathname encoding gitattribute ..., Rafael Garcia-Suarez, (Tue Jan 22, 5:13 am)
Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Design for pathname encoding gitattribute ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Tue Jan 22, 1:35 am)