Please read to the bottom of this email. As near as I can figure out,
you haven't done that on any of my previous emails.
On Jan 21, 2008, at 6:44 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
When I say "treat filenames as unicode" I'm implying the equivalence
comparisons and everything else that we've been talking about.
If that's what "as unicode" meant, then the phrase "as unicode" has
zero meaning.
No, you've argued against unicode equivalency in filenames. Can't you
figure out, when the entire time I've been talking about equivalency,
that I'm *still* talking about equivalency?
Yes, I understand quite well that you are against munging strings.
You're not using raw UTF-8, you're just using raw bytes. Calling it
UTF-8 doesn't mean anything, since you don't actually know that's what
it is. But this is fairly irrelevant.
How many times must I say the same thing over and over? I'm not
arguing that forced normalization is a good thing. I'm arguing that,
in a system which is unicode-aware top to bottom, forced normalization
is irrelevant to the user, since they don't care about the exact byte
sequence. And I'm also arguing that git should have some solution to
this problem. I find it interesting that you're perfectly happy to
rant and rail against your misperception of my argument, and yet you
consistently and repeatedly ignore my offers to stop this argument and
work towards a solution, as well as my comments on existing proposed
solutions.
Are you even reading to the end of my emails?
- Kevin Ballard
--
Kevin Ballard
http://kevin.sb.orgkevin@sb.orghttp://www.tildesoft.com