On Jan 21, 2008, at 7:36 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:And so has EVERYONE ELSE. You cannot hold me to a standard which you yourself do not apply. As I said before, I've been responding to emails in the midst of doing other things. So no, I can't learn an entirely new system in my off- time between other tasks, but I can respond to emails. You sure argue a lot for something you don't care about. I'm especially annoyed since I have made MANY offerings to stop this argument and work towards a solution, but NOBODY ELSE seems to care enough to actually accept that offer. And treating me like a moron (using all caps?) just shows how bad you are at actually reading my emails. I've been giving you and everyone else the courtesy of actually reading your emails, glad to know nobody else has bothered to read to the end of mine. -Kevin Ballard -- Kevin Ballard http://kevin.sb.org kevin@sb.org http://www.tildesoft.com
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| H. Peter Anvin | Re: [PATCH] x86: Construct 32 bit boot time page tables in native format. |
| Christoph Lameter | Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses |
git: | |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: [PATCH 06/32] IGET: Mark iget() and read_inode() as being obsolete [try #2] |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
