On Jan 21, 2008, at 11:48 AM, David Kastrup wrote:No, it's a question of hashing algorithm. And it's one that's fairly =20 easily solved simply by picking a specific nonambiguous UTF-8 encoding =20= before hashing. What makes you say that? You're right, that probably belongs in the VFS layer, but the behavior =20= is the same either way. You can't leave it up to user-space libraries =20= to enforce a filesystem encoding, because you can't rely on all =20 clients to behave properly. -Kevin Ballard --=20 Kevin Ballard http://kevin.sb.org kevin@sb.org http://www.tildesoft.com
| Davide Libenzi | Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Mariusz Kozlowski | [KJ PATCHES] mostly kmalloc + memset conversion to k[cz]alloc |
git: | |
| KOSAKI Motohiro | [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| Stefan Richter | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
