Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@...>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@...>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@...>, Git Mailing List <git@...>
Date: Sunday, January 20, 2008 - 6:09 pm

On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Steffen Prohaska wrote:

Ok. That seems to explain it (I have some trouble reading/comparing your 
profiles against mine, but yeah, fnmatch and getdirentries seem to be 
excessive from that "invert call tree" thing.

On Linux, the fnmatch and readdir overhead is way down in the noise both 
before and after the lstat removal. So removing the lstat's - which were 
fairly cheap, but there were _lots_ of them, made more of a relative 
difference on Linux.

I don't know what can be done about that on OS X. We really can't avoid 
reading the directory tree and matching it against ignore files. That's 
very integral for the status generation of "git commit", after all.

Maybe there are better fnmatch libraries for OS X? But getdirentries() was 
the bigger cost, and I don't see any alternative for that.

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Updated in-memory index cleanup, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Jan 18, 11:25 pm)
[PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Junio C Hamano, (Sat Jan 19, 3:45 am)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Johannes Schindelin, (Sat Jan 19, 10:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Johannes Schindelin, (Sat Jan 19, 9:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Steffen Prohaska, (Sun Jan 20, 11:10 am)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Steffen Prohaska, (Sun Jan 20, 5:40 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Linus Torvalds, (Sun Jan 20, 6:09 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Jan 20, 11:18 am)
[PATCH] Try to resurrect the handling for 'diff-index -m', Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Jan 20, 11:21 am)
[PATCH] Also use unpack_trees() in do_diff_cache(), Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Jan 20, 11:19 am)
Re: [PATCH] Also use unpack_trees() in do_diff_cache(), Linus Torvalds, (Sun Jan 20, 4:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Also use unpack_trees() in do_diff_cache(), Linus Torvalds, (Sun Jan 20, 5:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Also use unpack_trees() in do_diff_cache(), Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Jan 20, 7:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Also use unpack_trees() in do_diff_cache(), Linus Torvalds, (Sun Jan 20, 7:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Also use unpack_trees() in do_diff_cache(), Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Jan 20, 8:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Steffen Prohaska, (Sun Jan 20, 6:33 am)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Jan 20, 10:15 am)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Linus Torvalds, (Sat Jan 19, 10:02 pm)
[PATCH] index: be careful when handling long names, Junio C Hamano, (Sat Jan 19, 3:42 am)