Hi,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Steffen Prohaska wrote:
quoted text > On Jan 20, 2008, at 2:48 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > > Best time before:
> > >
> > > [torvalds@woody linux]$ time git commit > /dev/null
> > > real 0m0.399s
> > > user 0m0.232s
> > > sys 0m0.164s
> > >
> > > Best time after:
> > >
> > > [torvalds@woody linux]$ time git commit > /dev/null
> > > real 0m0.254s
> > > user 0m0.140s
> > > sys 0m0.112s
> >
> > Wow.
> >
> > > I bet you'll see a much bigger performance improvement from this on
> > > Windows in particular.
> >
> > I bet so, too. Traditionally, filesystem calls are painfully slow on
> > Windows.
> >
> > But I cannot test before Monday, so I would not be mad if somebody else
> > could perform some tests on Windows.
>
> Here are timings for Windows XP running in a virtual machine on a
> Laptop. The work tree contains 7k files. I stripped user and
> sys times because they are apparently meaningless for MINGW.
>
> Best time before:
>
> $ time git commit >/dev/null
> real 0m1.662s
>
> Best time after:
>
> $ time git commit >/dev/null
> real 0m1.196s
>
> The absolute time improvement is obviously larger, although the
> relative improvement is slightly smaller than in Linus' example.
>
>
> And here are the timings for the host system, which is Mac OS X,
> on the same work tree.
>
> Best time before:
>
> $ time git commit >/dev/null
> real 0m0.571s
> user 0m0.332s
> sys 0m0.237s
>
> Best time after:
>
> $ time git commit >/dev/null
> real 0m0.463s
> user 0m0.273s
> sys 0m0.186s
>
> Interestingly, the relative improvements are even smaller on Mac
> OS X.
Still, nothing to spit at.
FWIW I have made two patches which should be probably folded into Linus'
patch; I will post them as a reply.
Ciao,
Dscho
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html