Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@...>
Date: Saturday, January 19, 2008 - 3:47 pm

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>


Sadly, doing a simple "git commit" without anything else, will still 
apparently get us 69230 lstat() calls, with or without this patch. So we 
get 3 lstat() calls per path.

The call trace for the first one is

 - builtin-commit.c: line 786
	prepare_index
	  refresh_index
	    refresh_cache_ent
	      lstat

while the second one is

 - builtin-commit.c: line 793
	prepare_log_message
	  run_status
	    wt_status_print
	      wt_status_print_changed
	        run_diff_files
	          lstat

and the third one is

 - builtin-commit.c: line 795
	run_status
	  wt_status_print
	    wt_status_print_changed
	      run_diff_files
	        lstat

and the reason is that 
 - "run_diff_files()" doesn't honor ce_uptodate
 - ..but even if it did, wt_status_print_changed() does a wt_read_cache() 
   which will invalidate and re-read the index!

The first problem is trivially fixed (appended), the second one is notas 
trivial.

		Linus
---
 diff-lib.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/diff-lib.c b/diff-lib.c
index 4a05b02..5d5a950 100644
--- a/diff-lib.c
+++ b/diff-lib.c
@@ -435,6 +435,8 @@ int run_diff_files(struct rev_info *revs, unsigned int option)
 				continue;
 		}
 
+		if (ce_uptodate(ce))
+			continue;
 		if (lstat(ce->name, &st) < 0) {
 			if (errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOTDIR) {
 				perror(ce->name);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Updated in-memory index cleanup, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Jan 18, 11:25 pm)
[PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Junio C Hamano, (Sat Jan 19, 3:45 am)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Linus Torvalds, (Sat Jan 19, 3:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Johannes Schindelin, (Sat Jan 19, 10:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Johannes Schindelin, (Sat Jan 19, 9:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Steffen Prohaska, (Sun Jan 20, 11:10 am)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Steffen Prohaska, (Sun Jan 20, 5:40 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Jan 20, 11:18 am)
[PATCH] Try to resurrect the handling for 'diff-index -m', Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Jan 20, 11:21 am)
[PATCH] Also use unpack_trees() in do_diff_cache(), Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Jan 20, 11:19 am)
Re: [PATCH] Also use unpack_trees() in do_diff_cache(), Linus Torvalds, (Sun Jan 20, 4:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Also use unpack_trees() in do_diff_cache(), Linus Torvalds, (Sun Jan 20, 5:53 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Also use unpack_trees() in do_diff_cache(), Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Jan 20, 7:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Also use unpack_trees() in do_diff_cache(), Linus Torvalds, (Sun Jan 20, 7:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Also use unpack_trees() in do_diff_cache(), Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Jan 20, 8:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Steffen Prohaska, (Sun Jan 20, 6:33 am)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Jan 20, 10:15 am)
Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry., Linus Torvalds, (Sat Jan 19, 10:02 pm)
[PATCH] index: be careful when handling long names, Junio C Hamano, (Sat Jan 19, 3:42 am)