On Jan 19, 2008, at 3:48 AM, Dmitry Potapov wrote:In this case, git's index counts as a filesystem that treats filenames as sequences of bytes. But yes, it is possible, though somewhat difficult, to produce this problem on just HFS+. It's far more common when the file was originally added on a different filesystem From what the HFS+ technote says, it produces a variant of Normal Form D. This variant, while not guaranteed to be stable across versions of HFS+, but in practice it is stable. What would you prefer I call it? I'm not sure how that would solve anything. Sure, it would provide a stable, known encoding for git to compare filenames against, but that would only work if the filename is known to be Unicode, and as it has been pointed out on other filesystems the filename can be whatever encoding the user chooses (which, IMHO, is a flaw). It looks like their problem was binary compatibility with strings from other clients that were using Normal Form C instead of Normal Form D. git's problem is that it's only even using a known encoding on HFS+. -Kevin Ballard -- Kevin Ballard http://kevin.sb.org kevin@sb.org http://www.tildesoft.com
| David Miller | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jan Engelhardt | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
