Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:Although the discussion was triggered by that Tortoise thing, the RFC patch was not about helping that. That's a new feature asked long after we went into rc freeze, and I am not interested in discussing such a feature, especially when I am sick. The only objective was to make sure that a patch that is not kosher in git-apply's eyes is not marked with "diff --git"; otherwise, its output will confuse git-apply. As --no-prefix will be a new feature in 1.5.4, we would be shipping with a known-to-be-bad new feature that is --no-prefix, unless we do something about it. Fixing that breakage was the sole motivation behind my patch. I think a reasonable short-term solution might be to disable any git specific stuff (renames, rewrites, etc) when --no-prefix and its friends are used, along with the patch you are commenting on to remove " --git" from the header. That would at least make sure that the --no-prefix feature is safe. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc8 |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg KH | Linux 2.6.25.10 |
git: | |
| Sverre Rabbelier | Git vs Monotone |
| Robert Collins | Re: VCS comparison table |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: git-diff on touched files: bug or feature? |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry. |
| Steve Shockley | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| chefren | Re: [Fwd: Open-Hardware] |
| ropers | Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .. |
| Leon Dippenaar | New tcp stack attack |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| Ilpo Järvinen | Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ |
| Sangtae Ha | Re: A Linux TCP SACK Question |
