Florian La Roche <laroche@redhat.com> writes:I can see that easier access to commitdiff output is sometimes desirable. If you are making this change unconditional, however, I think there needs a list discussion between you and the silent majority of people that have been perfectly happy with the current "log only" behaviour. And to have that discussion, you first have to wake them up, which this patch would serve well as a wake-up call. But if that was the purpose of the posting, please (1) mark the patch as such (commonly done by saying [RFC/PATCH] instead), and (2) keep me out of the "To:" list, if the patch is not for inclusion but for discussion ("cc:" is fine but it's redundant as long as you are sending to the list). After such a discussion, we may end up finding out that everybody have been silently unhappy and wanted to have commitdiff there, and agree on doing this unconditionally. But we do not know that yet. Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Thomas Gleixner | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| James Bottomley | [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project |
| James Morris | Re: LSM conversion to static interface |
git: | |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: [PATCH 06/32] IGET: Mark iget() and read_inode() as being obsolete [try #2] |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH take 2] pkt_sched: Protect gen estimators under est_lock. |
